How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Eritrea?

20 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2011.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Ecuador vs Eritrea: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per capita

Ecuador

1,213 constant LCU per person

in 2025

Eritrea

1,337 constant LCU per person

in 2011

Ecuador rank

156th

Eritrea rank

154th

Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per capita over time

Ecuador
Eritrea

How they compare

Eritrea currently reports 1,337 constant LCU per person against 1,213 constant LCU per person in Ecuador, a difference of 124 constant LCU per person.

That makes Eritrea's figure about 1.1 times Ecuador's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 20 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Ecuador ahead.

Ecuador ranks 156th and Eritrea ranks 154th of 168 countries.

Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Ecuador	Eritrea	Difference	Ahead
1990s	966.29 constant LCU per person	554.33 constant LCU per person	411.95 constant LCU per person	Ecuador
2000s	861.12 constant LCU per person	589.18 constant LCU per person	271.94 constant LCU per person	Ecuador
2010s	1,176 constant LCU per person	788.52 constant LCU per person	387.91 constant LCU per person	Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per capita, Ecuador or Eritrea?: Eritrea, at 1,337 constant LCU per person against 1,213 constant LCU per person in Ecuador as of 2011.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per capita between Ecuador and Eritrea?: 124 constant LCU per person, with Eritrea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Eritrea?: 20 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2011.
How do Ecuador and Eritrea rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per capita?: Ecuador ranks 156th and Eritrea ranks 154th of 168 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Eritrea: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-capita/ecuador/eritrea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-capita/ecuador/eritrea/">Ecuador vs Eritrea: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per capita
Unit: constant LCU per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 168 places, 6,965 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed: 22 September 2026

Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.