Belarus vs Guatemala: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per capita

Belarus
5,850 constant LCU per person
in 2025
Guatemala
5,955 constant LCU per person
in 2025
Belarus rank
116th
Guatemala rank
114th

Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per capita over time

  • Belarus
  • Guatemala
2.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k196019922025

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports 5,955 constant LCU per person against 5,850 constant LCU per person in Belarus, a difference of 105 constant LCU per person.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 36 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Guatemala ahead.

Belarus ranks 116th and Guatemala ranks 114th of 168 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 1 and Guatemala in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Guatemala Difference Ahead
1990s 1,595 constant LCU per person 3,730 constant LCU per person 2,135 constant LCU per person Guatemala
2000s 2,855 constant LCU per person 4,538 constant LCU per person 1,683 constant LCU per person Guatemala
2010s 5,867 constant LCU per person 4,066 constant LCU per person 1,801 constant LCU per person Belarus
2020s 5,015 constant LCU per person 5,124 constant LCU per person 108.76 constant LCU per person Guatemala

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per capita, Belarus or Guatemala?
Guatemala, at 5,955 constant LCU per person against 5,850 constant LCU per person in Belarus as of 2025.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per capita between Belarus and Guatemala?
105 constant LCU per person, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Guatemala?
36 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2025.
How do Belarus and Guatemala rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (constant lcu), per capita?
Belarus ranks 116th and Guatemala ranks 114th of 168 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Guatemala: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 22 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-capita/belarus/guatemala/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-lcu-per-capita/belarus/guatemala/">Belarus vs Guatemala: Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU), per capita
Unit
constant LCU per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
168 places, 6,965 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation (constant LCU) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.