Mauritius vs Zimbabwe: Gross fixed capital formation
Gross fixed capital formation over time
- Mauritius
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 2.78 billion constant 2015 US$ against 2.70 billion constant 2015 US$ in Mauritius, a difference of 75.86 million constant 2015 US$.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 16 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Mauritius ahead.
Mauritius ranks 129th and Zimbabwe ranks 128th of 160 countries.
Mauritius has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.35 billion constant 2015 US$ | 1.01 billion constant 2015 US$ | 1.33 billion constant 2015 US$ | Mauritius |
| 2010s | 2.28 billion constant 2015 US$ | 1.98 billion constant 2015 US$ | 296.50 million constant 2015 US$ | Mauritius |
| 2020s | 2.35 billion constant 2015 US$ | 2.32 billion constant 2015 US$ | 28.50 million constant 2015 US$ | Mauritius |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross fixed capital formation, Mauritius or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 2.78 billion constant 2015 US$ against 2.70 billion constant 2015 US$ in Mauritius as of 2024.
- What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation between Mauritius and Zimbabwe?
- 75.86 million constant 2015 US$, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Zimbabwe?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2024.
- How do Mauritius and Zimbabwe rank globally for gross fixed capital formation?
- Mauritius ranks 129th and Zimbabwe ranks 128th of 160 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross fixed capital formation includes acquisitions less disposals of fixed assets during the accounting period, including certain specified expenditures on services that add to the value of non-produced assets. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment is 2015. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.