Mauritius vs Yemen: Gross fixed capital formation
Gross fixed capital formation over time
- Mauritius
- Yemen
How they compare
Mauritius currently reports 2.70 billion constant 2015 US$ against 2.16 billion constant 2015 US$ in Yemen, a difference of 540.51 million constant 2015 US$.
That makes Mauritius's figure about 1.3 times Yemen's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 29 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Yemen ahead.
Mauritius ranks 129th and Yemen ranks 132nd of 160 countries.
Yemen has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | Yemen | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.20 billion constant 2015 US$ | 6.06 billion constant 2015 US$ | 4.86 billion constant 2015 US$ | Yemen |
| 2000s | 1.84 billion constant 2015 US$ | 8.86 billion constant 2015 US$ | 7.03 billion constant 2015 US$ | Yemen |
| 2010s | 2.25 billion constant 2015 US$ | 3.15 billion constant 2015 US$ | 902.47 million constant 2015 US$ | Yemen |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross fixed capital formation, Mauritius or Yemen?
- Mauritius, at 2.70 billion constant 2015 US$ against 2.16 billion constant 2015 US$ in Yemen as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation between Mauritius and Yemen?
- 540.51 million constant 2015 US$, with Mauritius ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Yemen?
- 29 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2018.
- How do Mauritius and Yemen rank globally for gross fixed capital formation?
- Mauritius ranks 129th and Yemen ranks 132nd of 160 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross fixed capital formation includes acquisitions less disposals of fixed assets during the accounting period, including certain specified expenditures on services that add to the value of non-produced assets. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment is 2015. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.