Kiribati vs Marshall Islands: Gross fixed capital formation

Kiribati
90.99 million constant 2015 US$
in 2024
Marshall Islands
60.68 million constant 2015 US$
in 2024
Kiribati rank
156th
Marshall Islands rank
159th

Gross fixed capital formation over time

  • Kiribati
  • Marshall Islands
25.0M50.0M75.0M100.0M125.0M200420142024

How they compare

Kiribati currently reports 90.99 million constant 2015 US$ against 60.68 million constant 2015 US$ in Marshall Islands, a difference of 30.31 million constant 2015 US$.

That makes Kiribati's figure about 1.5 times Marshall Islands's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Marshall Islands ahead.

Kiribati ranks 156th and Marshall Islands ranks 159th of 160 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Kiribati averaged higher in 1 and Marshall Islands in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kiribati Marshall Islands Difference Ahead
2000s 21.63 million constant 2015 US$ 44.35 million constant 2015 US$ 22.71 million constant 2015 US$ Marshall Islands
2010s 45.13 million constant 2015 US$ 52.11 million constant 2015 US$ 6.98 million constant 2015 US$ Marshall Islands
2020s 58.77 million constant 2015 US$ 56.07 million constant 2015 US$ 2.70 million constant 2015 US$ Kiribati

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation, Kiribati or Marshall Islands?
Kiribati, at 90.99 million constant 2015 US$ against 60.68 million constant 2015 US$ in Marshall Islands as of 2024.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation between Kiribati and Marshall Islands?
30.31 million constant 2015 US$, with Kiribati ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Marshall Islands?
19 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2024.
How do Kiribati and Marshall Islands rank globally for gross fixed capital formation?
Kiribati ranks 156th and Marshall Islands ranks 159th of 160 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kiribati vs Marshall Islands: Gross fixed capital formation. Statizoid, drawing on Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks. Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-2015-us/kiribati/marshall-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-2015-us/kiribati/marshall-islands/">Kiribati vs Marshall Islands: Gross fixed capital formation</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$)
Unit
constant 2015 US$
Source
Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
193 places, 8,101 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation includes acquisitions less disposals of fixed assets during the accounting period, including certain specified expenditures on services that add to the value of non-produced assets. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment is 2015. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.