Bermuda vs Greenland: Gross fixed capital formation
Gross fixed capital formation over time
- Bermuda
- Greenland
How they compare
Greenland currently reports 1.05 billion constant 2015 US$ against 872.17 million constant 2015 US$ in Bermuda, a difference of 175.46 million constant 2015 US$.
That makes Greenland's figure about 1.2 times Bermuda's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 2014 it was Bermuda ahead.
Bermuda ranks 139th and Greenland ranks 138th of 160 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Bermuda averaged higher in 1 and Greenland in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bermuda | Greenland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 918.45 million constant 2015 US$ | 659.33 million constant 2015 US$ | 259.12 million constant 2015 US$ | Bermuda |
| 2020s | 852.06 million constant 2015 US$ | 1.05 billion constant 2015 US$ | 197.33 million constant 2015 US$ | Greenland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross fixed capital formation, Bermuda or Greenland?
- Greenland, at 1.05 billion constant 2015 US$ against 872.17 million constant 2015 US$ in Bermuda as of 2023.
- What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation between Bermuda and Greenland?
- 175.46 million constant 2015 US$, with Greenland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bermuda and Greenland?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2023.
- How do Bermuda and Greenland rank globally for gross fixed capital formation?
- Bermuda ranks 139th and Greenland ranks 138th of 160 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Organizations and/or Central Banks, published as Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross fixed capital formation includes acquisitions less disposals of fixed assets during the accounting period, including certain specified expenditures on services that add to the value of non-produced assets. This indicator is expressed in constant prices, meaning the series has been adjusted to account for price changes over time. The reference year for this adjustment is 2015. This indicator is expressed in United States dollars.