How many years of comparable data are there for Sweden and Uganda?

44 years are reported by both, from 1982 to 2025.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Sweden vs Uganda: Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP

Sweden

0.215 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP

in 2025

Uganda

0.215 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP

in 2025

Sweden rank

58th

Uganda rank

57th

Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP over time

Sweden
Uganda

How they compare

Uganda currently reports 0.215 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.215 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Sweden, a difference of 0 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 44 shared years of data; in 1982 it was Sweden ahead.

Sweden ranks 58th and Uganda ranks 57th of 161 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Sweden averaged higher in 1 and Uganda in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Sweden	Uganda	Difference	Ahead
1980s	0.4372 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	0.2276 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	0.2096 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	Sweden
1990s	0.2518 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	0.3485 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	0.0968 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	Uganda
2000s	0.2499 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	0.3748 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	0.1249 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	Uganda
2010s	0.2123 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	0.2532 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	0.0408 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	Uganda
2020s	0.233 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	0.2428 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	0.0097 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	Uganda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per unit of gdp, Sweden or Uganda?: Uganda, at 0.215 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.215 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Sweden as of 2025.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per unit of gdp between Sweden and Uganda?: 0 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP, with Uganda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Sweden and Uganda?: 44 years are reported by both, from 1982 to 2025.
How do Sweden and Uganda rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per unit of gdp?: Sweden ranks 58th and Uganda ranks 57th of 161 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Sweden vs Uganda: Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/sweden/uganda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/sweden/uganda/">Sweden vs Uganda: Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP
Unit: constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 194 places, 8,107 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed: 07 September 2026

Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.