Luxembourg vs Puerto Rico: Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP

Luxembourg
0.1017 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Puerto Rico
0.1057 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Luxembourg rank
150th
Puerto Rico rank
148th

Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP over time

  • Luxembourg
  • Puerto Rico
00.511.5196419942025

How they compare

Puerto Rico currently reports 0.1057 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.1017 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Luxembourg, a difference of 0.004 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 56 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Luxembourg ahead.

Luxembourg ranks 150th and Puerto Rico ranks 148th of 161 countries.

Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Luxembourg Puerto Rico Difference Ahead
1970s 1.02 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.7202 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.2949 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Luxembourg
1980s 0.4971 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.2045 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.2925 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Luxembourg
1990s 0.3011 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1966 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1045 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Luxembourg
2000s 0.2369 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.156 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.081 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Luxembourg
2010s 0.165 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1019 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0631 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Luxembourg
2020s 0.1292 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1078 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0214 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Luxembourg

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per unit of gdp, Luxembourg or Puerto Rico?
Puerto Rico, at 0.1057 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.1017 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Luxembourg as of 2025.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per unit of gdp between Luxembourg and Puerto Rico?
0.004 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP, with Puerto Rico ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and Puerto Rico?
56 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2025.
How do Luxembourg and Puerto Rico rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per unit of gdp?
Luxembourg ranks 150th and Puerto Rico ranks 148th of 161 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Luxembourg vs Puerto Rico: Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/luxembourg/puerto-rico-us/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/luxembourg/puerto-rico-us/">Luxembourg vs Puerto Rico: Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
194 places, 8,107 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.