How many years of comparable data are there for Italy and Namibia?

46 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2025.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Italy vs Namibia: Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP

Italy

0.1861 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP

in 2025

Namibia

0.1943 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP

in 2025

Italy rank

75th

Namibia rank

72nd

Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP over time

Italy
Namibia

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 0.1943 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.1861 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Italy, a difference of 0.0082 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 46 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Italy ahead.

Italy ranks 75th and Namibia ranks 72nd of 161 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Italy averaged higher in 3 and Namibia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Italy	Namibia	Difference	Ahead
1980s	0.5012 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	0.1861 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	0.3151 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	Italy
1990s	0.2709 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	0.1688 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	0.1021 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	Italy
2000s	0.2483 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	0.2127 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	0.0356 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	Italy
2010s	0.1649 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	0.2114 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	0.0465 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	Namibia
2020s	0.1906 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	0.1916 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	0.001 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per unit of gdp, Italy or Namibia?: Namibia, at 0.1943 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.1861 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Italy as of 2025.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per unit of gdp between Italy and Namibia?: 0.0082 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Italy and Namibia?: 46 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2025.
How do Italy and Namibia rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per unit of gdp?: Italy ranks 75th and Namibia ranks 72nd of 161 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Italy vs Namibia: Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/italy/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/italy/namibia/">Italy vs Namibia: Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP
Unit: constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 194 places, 8,107 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed: 07 September 2026

Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.