IDA total vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP

IDA total
0.2758 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Tanzania, United Republic of
0.3844 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
IDA total rank
3rd
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
4th

Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP over time

  • IDA total
  • Tanzania, United Republic of
00.10.20.30.40.5199020072025

How they compare

Tanzania, United Republic of currently reports 0.3844 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.2758 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in IDA total, a difference of 0.1086 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP.

That makes Tanzania, United Republic of's figure about 1.4 times IDA total's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 30 shared years of data; in 1996 it was IDA total ahead.

IDA total ranks 3rd and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 4th of 33 groups.

Across the 4 decades both report, IDA total averaged higher in 2 and Tanzania, United Republic of in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade IDA total Tanzania, United Republic of Difference Ahead
1990s 0.3341 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.2286 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.1055 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP IDA total
2000s 0.3216 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.2847 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0368 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP IDA total
2010s 0.2369 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.3276 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0907 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Tanzania, United Republic of
2020s 0.2629 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.3799 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.117 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Tanzania, United Republic of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per unit of gdp, IDA total or Tanzania, United Republic of?
Tanzania, United Republic of, at 0.3844 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.2758 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in IDA total as of 2025.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per unit of gdp between IDA total and Tanzania, United Republic of?
0.1086 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP, with Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for IDA total and Tanzania, United Republic of?
30 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
How do IDA total and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per unit of gdp?
IDA total ranks 3rd and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 4th of 33 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

IDA total vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/ida-total/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/ida-total/tanzania/">IDA total vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
194 places, 8,107 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.