Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Japan: Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
0.2263 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2025
Japan
0.2985 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) rank
13th
Japan rank
13th

Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP over time

  • Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
  • Japan
00.511.522.5197019972025

How they compare

Japan currently reports 0.2985 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.2263 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC), a difference of 0.0722 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP.

That makes Japan's figure about 1.3 times Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)'s.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Japan ahead.

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 13th and Japan ranks 13th of 33 groups.

Across the 3 decades both report, Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) averaged higher in 2 and Japan in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) Japan Difference Ahead
2000s 0.241 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.2371 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0039 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
2010s 0.2483 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.2181 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0302 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
2020s 0.2489 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.2665 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP 0.0176 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP Japan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per unit of gdp, Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) or Japan?
Japan, at 0.2985 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.2263 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) as of 2024.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per unit of gdp between Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Japan?
0.0722 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP, with Japan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Japan?
19 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2024.
How do Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Japan rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per unit of gdp?
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 13th and Japan ranks 13th of 33 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Japan: Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/heavily-indebted-poor-countries-hipc/japan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/heavily-indebted-poor-countries-hipc/japan/">Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Japan: Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
194 places, 8,107 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.