How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Zimbabwe?

12 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2020.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Cuba vs Zimbabwe: Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP

Cuba

0.0786 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP

in 2020

Zimbabwe

0.0669 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Cuba rank

154th

Zimbabwe rank

155th

Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP over time

Cuba
Zimbabwe

How they compare

Cuba currently reports 0.0786 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.0669 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.0117 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP.

That makes Cuba's figure about 1.2 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Cuba ranks 154th and Zimbabwe ranks 155th of 161 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Cuba	Zimbabwe	Difference	Ahead
2000s	0.1016 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	0.1047 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	0.0032 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	Zimbabwe
2010s	0.0867 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	0.096 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	0.0093 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	Zimbabwe
2020s	0.0786 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	0.0545 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	0.0241 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP	Cuba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per unit of gdp, Cuba or Zimbabwe?: Cuba, at 0.0786 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP against 0.0669 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP in Zimbabwe as of 2020.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per unit of gdp between Cuba and Zimbabwe?: 0.0117 constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP, with Cuba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Zimbabwe?: 12 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2020.
How do Cuba and Zimbabwe rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per unit of gdp?: Cuba ranks 154th and Zimbabwe ranks 155th of 161 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs Zimbabwe: Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/cuba/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-2015-us-per-unit-of-gdp/cuba/zimbabwe/">Cuba vs Zimbabwe: Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per unit of GDP
Unit: constant 2015 US$ per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 194 places, 8,107 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed: 07 September 2026

Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.