Rwanda vs Serbia: Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square

Rwanda
178,730 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Serbia
162,215 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Rwanda rank
62nd
Serbia rank
64th

Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square over time

  • Rwanda
  • Serbia
050.0k100.0k150.0k200.0k196519942023

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 178,730 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 162,215 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Serbia, a difference of 16,515 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.1 times Serbia's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Serbia ahead.

Rwanda ranks 62nd and Serbia ranks 64th of 159 countries.

Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Rwanda Serbia Difference Ahead
2000s 35,788 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 88,038 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 52,250 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Serbia
2010s 75,063 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 87,584 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 12,522 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Serbia
2020s 141,972 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 145,243 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 3,271 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Serbia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square, Rwanda or Serbia?
Rwanda, at 178,730 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 162,215 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Serbia as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square between Rwanda and Serbia?
16,515 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Serbia?
18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
How do Rwanda and Serbia rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square?
Rwanda ranks 62nd and Serbia ranks 64th of 159 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Rwanda vs Serbia: Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/rwanda/serbia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/rwanda/serbia/">Rwanda vs Serbia: Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
192 places, 7,629 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.