Panama vs Philippines: Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square

Panama
316,251 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Philippines
339,672 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Panama rank
44th
Philippines rank
42nd

Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square over time

  • Panama
  • Philippines
0100.0k200.0k300.0k400.0k199620092023

How they compare

Philippines currently reports 339,672 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 316,251 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Panama, a difference of 23,421 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Philippines's figure about 1.1 times Panama's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Philippines ahead.

Panama ranks 44th and Philippines ranks 42nd of 159 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Panama averaged higher in 1 and Philippines in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Panama Philippines Difference Ahead
2000s 74,094 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 103,017 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 28,924 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Philippines
2010s 263,088 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 236,745 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 26,343 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Panama
2020s 243,802 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 299,989 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 56,186 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Philippines

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square, Panama or Philippines?
Philippines, at 339,672 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 316,251 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Panama as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square between Panama and Philippines?
23,421 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Philippines ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Panama and Philippines?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Panama and Philippines rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square?
Panama ranks 44th and Philippines ranks 42nd of 159 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Panama vs Philippines: Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/panama/philippines/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/panama/philippines/">Panama vs Philippines: Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
192 places, 7,629 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.