Norway vs Panama: Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square

Norway
313,268 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Panama
316,251 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Norway rank
45th
Panama rank
44th

Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square over time

  • Norway
  • Panama
0100.0k200.0k300.0k197019962023

How they compare

Panama currently reports 316,251 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 313,268 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Norway, a difference of 2,983 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 28 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Norway ahead.

Norway ranks 45th and Panama ranks 44th of 159 countries.

Norway has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Norway Panama Difference Ahead
1990s 159,114 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 47,155 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 111,959 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Norway
2000s 199,625 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 74,094 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 125,531 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Norway
2010s 271,030 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 263,088 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 7,941 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Norway
2020s 314,474 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 243,802 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 70,672 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Norway

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square, Norway or Panama?
Panama, at 316,251 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 313,268 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Norway as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square between Norway and Panama?
2,983 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Panama ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Norway and Panama?
28 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2023.
How do Norway and Panama rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square?
Norway ranks 45th and Panama ranks 44th of 159 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Norway vs Panama: Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/norway/panama/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/norway/panama/">Norway vs Panama: Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
192 places, 7,629 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.