Libya vs Zimbabwe: Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square

Libya
4,541 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
7,091 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Libya rank
148th
Zimbabwe rank
145th

Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square over time

  • Libya
  • Zimbabwe
2.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k10.0k200920162023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 7,091 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 4,541 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Libya, a difference of 2,550 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.6 times Libya's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Libya ahead.

Libya ranks 148th and Zimbabwe ranks 145th of 159 countries.

Across the 2 decades both report, Libya averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Libya Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
2010s 6,550 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 5,127 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1,422 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Libya
2020s 5,076 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 5,717 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 641.92 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square, Libya or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 7,091 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 4,541 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Libya as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square between Libya and Zimbabwe?
2,550 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Zimbabwe?
14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
How do Libya and Zimbabwe rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square?
Libya ranks 148th and Zimbabwe ranks 145th of 159 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Libya vs Zimbabwe: Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/libya/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/libya/zimbabwe/">Libya vs Zimbabwe: Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
192 places, 7,629 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.