Libya vs Namibia: Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square

Libya
4,541 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Namibia
4,130 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Libya rank
148th
Namibia rank
150th

Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square over time

  • Libya
  • Namibia
02.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k10.0k198020012023

How they compare

Libya currently reports 4,541 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 4,130 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Namibia, a difference of 411 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Libya's figure about 1.1 times Namibia's.

Across all 14 years both countries report, Libya has been ahead every year.

Libya ranks 148th and Namibia ranks 150th of 159 countries.

Libya has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Libya Namibia Difference Ahead
2010s 6,550 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 3,118 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 3,431 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Libya
2020s 5,076 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 2,652 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 2,424 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Libya

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square, Libya or Namibia?
Libya, at 4,541 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 4,130 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Namibia as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square between Libya and Namibia?
411 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Libya ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Namibia?
14 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2023.
How do Libya and Namibia rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square?
Libya ranks 148th and Namibia ranks 150th of 159 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Libya vs Namibia: Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/libya/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/libya/namibia/">Libya vs Namibia: Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
192 places, 7,629 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.