India vs Norway: Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square

India
339,507 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Norway
313,268 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
India rank
43rd
Norway rank
45th

Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square over time

  • India
  • Norway
0100.0k200.0k300.0k196119922023

How they compare

India currently reports 339,507 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 313,268 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Norway, a difference of 26,239 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes India's figure about 1.1 times Norway's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Norway ahead.

India ranks 43rd and Norway ranks 45th of 159 countries.

Norway has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade India Norway Difference Ahead
1970s 13,820 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 103,850 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 90,030 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Norway
1980s 21,533 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 126,089 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 104,556 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Norway
1990s 40,185 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 132,988 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 92,803 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Norway
2000s 95,312 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 199,625 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 104,313 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Norway
2010s 208,328 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 271,030 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 62,702 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Norway
2020s 299,083 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 314,474 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 15,391 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Norway

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square, India or Norway?
India, at 339,507 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 313,268 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Norway as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square between India and Norway?
26,239 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with India ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for India and Norway?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do India and Norway rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square?
India ranks 43rd and Norway ranks 45th of 159 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

India vs Norway: Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/india/norway/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/india/norway/">India vs Norway: Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
192 places, 7,629 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.