Iceland vs Tunisia: Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square

Iceland
55,846 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Tunisia
54,368 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Iceland rank
96th
Tunisia rank
98th

Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square over time

  • Iceland
  • Tunisia
020.0k40.0k60.0k196519942023

How they compare

Iceland currently reports 55,846 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 54,368 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Tunisia, a difference of 1,478 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Iceland ahead.

Iceland ranks 96th and Tunisia ranks 98th of 159 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Iceland averaged higher in 1 and Tunisia in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iceland Tunisia Difference Ahead
1970s 14,921 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 13,177 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1,744 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Iceland
1980s 18,398 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 20,445 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 2,047 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Tunisia
1990s 20,320 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 26,768 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 6,448 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Tunisia
2000s 36,860 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 40,595 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 3,735 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Tunisia
2010s 32,349 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 63,332 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 30,983 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Tunisia
2020s 48,547 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 52,507 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 3,960 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Tunisia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square, Iceland or Tunisia?
Iceland, at 55,846 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 54,368 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Tunisia as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square between Iceland and Tunisia?
1,478 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Iceland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Tunisia?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Iceland and Tunisia rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square?
Iceland ranks 96th and Tunisia ranks 98th of 159 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Iceland vs Tunisia: Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/iceland/tunisia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/iceland/tunisia/">Iceland vs Tunisia: Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
192 places, 7,629 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.