Hong Kong, China vs Singapore: Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square
Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square over time
- Hong Kong, China
- Singapore
How they compare
Singapore currently reports 129.80 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 58.37 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Hong Kong, China, a difference of 71.43 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.
That makes Singapore's figure about 2.2 times Hong Kong, China's.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Hong Kong, China ahead.
Hong Kong, China ranks 3rd and Singapore ranks 2nd of 159 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Hong Kong, China averaged higher in 3 and Singapore in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong, China | Singapore | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 5.42 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 2.14 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 3.29 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | Hong Kong, China |
| 1970s | 9.85 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 8.95 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 906,738 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | Hong Kong, China |
| 1980s | 22.29 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 21.18 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 1.11 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | Hong Kong, China |
| 1990s | 41.36 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 46.30 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 4.94 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | Singapore |
| 2000s | 48.87 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 65.74 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 16.87 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | Singapore |
| 2010s | 64.97 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 112.16 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 47.19 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | Singapore |
| 2020s | 54.90 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 123.09 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | 68.19 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre | Singapore |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square, Hong Kong, China or Singapore?
- Singapore, at 129.80 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 58.37 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Hong Kong, China as of 2023.
- What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square between Hong Kong, China and Singapore?
- 71.43 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Singapore ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Singapore?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Hong Kong, China and Singapore rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square?
- Hong Kong, China ranks 3rd and Singapore ranks 2nd of 159 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.