Honduras vs Iceland: Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square

Honduras
56,338 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Iceland
55,846 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Honduras rank
95th
Iceland rank
96th

Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square over time

  • Honduras
  • Iceland
020.0k40.0k60.0k196119922023

How they compare

Honduras currently reports 56,338 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 55,846 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Iceland, a difference of 492 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Iceland ahead.

Honduras ranks 95th and Iceland ranks 96th of 159 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Honduras averaged higher in 1 and Iceland in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Honduras Iceland Difference Ahead
1970s 1,613 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 14,921 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 13,307 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Iceland
1980s 3,599 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 18,398 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 14,798 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Iceland
1990s 14,826 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 20,320 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 5,494 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Iceland
2000s 34,736 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 36,860 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 2,124 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Iceland
2010s 41,850 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 32,349 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 9,502 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Honduras
2020s 47,806 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 48,547 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 740.78 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Iceland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square, Honduras or Iceland?
Honduras, at 56,338 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 55,846 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Iceland as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square between Honduras and Iceland?
492 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Honduras ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Honduras and Iceland?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Honduras and Iceland rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square?
Honduras ranks 95th and Iceland ranks 96th of 159 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Honduras vs Iceland: Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/honduras/iceland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/honduras/iceland/">Honduras vs Iceland: Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
192 places, 7,629 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.