Guatemala vs Serbia: Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square

Guatemala
126,125 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Serbia
162,215 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Guatemala rank
67th
Serbia rank
64th

Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square over time

  • Guatemala
  • Serbia
050.0k100.0k150.0k196119922023

How they compare

Serbia currently reports 162,215 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 126,125 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Guatemala, a difference of 36,090 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Serbia's figure about 1.3 times Guatemala's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Guatemala ahead.

Guatemala ranks 67th and Serbia ranks 64th of 159 countries.

Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guatemala Serbia Difference Ahead
2000s 84,360 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 88,038 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 3,678 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Serbia
2010s 84,033 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 87,584 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 3,551 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Serbia
2020s 112,153 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 145,243 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 33,090 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Serbia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square, Guatemala or Serbia?
Serbia, at 162,215 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 126,125 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Guatemala as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square between Guatemala and Serbia?
36,090 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Serbia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and Serbia?
18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
How do Guatemala and Serbia rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square?
Guatemala ranks 67th and Serbia ranks 64th of 159 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs Serbia: Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/serbia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/guatemala/serbia/">Guatemala vs Serbia: Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
192 places, 7,629 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.