Equatorial Guinea vs Sao Tome and Principe: Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square

Equatorial Guinea
30,253 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Sao Tome and Principe
32,617 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Equatorial Guinea rank
122nd
Sao Tome and Principe rank
121st

Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Sao Tome and Principe
0100.0k200.0k300.0k200520142023

How they compare

Sao Tome and Principe currently reports 32,617 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 30,253 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 2,364 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Sao Tome and Principe's figure about 1.1 times Equatorial Guinea's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 16 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 122nd and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 121st of 159 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 2 and Sao Tome and Principe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
2000s 248,290 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 26,326 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 221,964 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
2010s 157,499 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 35,525 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 121,974 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
2020s 29,097 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 39,094 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 9,997 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square, Equatorial Guinea or Sao Tome and Principe?
Sao Tome and Principe, at 32,617 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 30,253 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Equatorial Guinea as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square between Equatorial Guinea and Sao Tome and Principe?
2,364 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Sao Tome and Principe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Sao Tome and Principe?
16 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2023.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 122nd and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 121st of 159 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Sao Tome and Principe: Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/equatorial-guinea/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/equatorial-guinea/sao-tome-and-principe/">Equatorial Guinea vs Sao Tome and Principe: Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
192 places, 7,629 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.