Equatorial Guinea vs Kazakhstan: Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square

Equatorial Guinea
30,253 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Kazakhstan
25,111 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Equatorial Guinea rank
122nd
Kazakhstan rank
125th

Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Kazakhstan
0100.0k200.0k300.0k199220072023

How they compare

Equatorial Guinea currently reports 30,253 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 25,111 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Kazakhstan, a difference of 5,142 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 1.2 times Kazakhstan's.

Across all 19 years both countries report, Equatorial Guinea has been ahead every year.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 122nd and Kazakhstan ranks 125th of 159 countries.

Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Kazakhstan Difference Ahead
2000s 178,172 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 10,420 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 167,752 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
2010s 157,499 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 15,381 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 142,118 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
2020s 29,097 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 21,838 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 7,259 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square, Equatorial Guinea or Kazakhstan?
Equatorial Guinea, at 30,253 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 25,111 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Kazakhstan as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square between Equatorial Guinea and Kazakhstan?
5,142 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Kazakhstan?
19 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2023.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Kazakhstan rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 122nd and Kazakhstan ranks 125th of 159 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Kazakhstan: Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/equatorial-guinea/kazakhstan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/equatorial-guinea/kazakhstan/">Equatorial Guinea vs Kazakhstan: Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
192 places, 7,629 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.