Ecuador vs Kiribati: Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square

Ecuador
78,403 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Kiribati
88,392 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador rank
80th
Kiribati rank
78th

Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square over time

  • Ecuador
  • Kiribati
20.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k100.0k196119922023

How they compare

Kiribati currently reports 88,392 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 78,403 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Ecuador, a difference of 9,989 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Kiribati's figure about 1.1 times Ecuador's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Ecuador ahead.

Ecuador ranks 80th and Kiribati ranks 78th of 159 countries.

Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Kiribati Difference Ahead
2000s 50,988 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 26,709 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 24,279 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Ecuador
2010s 80,939 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 55,712 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 25,227 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Ecuador
2020s 72,868 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 62,608 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 10,260 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square, Ecuador or Kiribati?
Kiribati, at 88,392 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 78,403 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Ecuador as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square between Ecuador and Kiribati?
9,989 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Kiribati ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Kiribati?
18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and Kiribati rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square?
Ecuador ranks 80th and Kiribati ranks 78th of 159 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Kiribati: Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/kiribati/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/ecuador/kiribati/">Ecuador vs Kiribati: Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
192 places, 7,629 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.