Denmark vs Germany: Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square

Denmark
2.00 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Germany
2.09 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Denmark rank
18th
Germany rank
17th

Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square over time

  • Denmark
  • Germany
500.0k1.0M1.5M2.0M196619942023

How they compare

Germany currently reports 2.09 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 2.00 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Denmark, a difference of 84,790 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

Across all 54 years both countries report, Germany has been ahead every year.

Denmark ranks 18th and Germany ranks 17th of 159 countries.

Germany has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Denmark Germany Difference Ahead
1970s 642,052 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1.09 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 443,097 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Germany
1980s 718,114 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1.20 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 480,390 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Germany
1990s 979,922 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1.60 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 621,494 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Germany
2000s 1.40 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1.69 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 286,242 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Germany
2010s 1.50 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1.95 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 453,483 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Germany
2020s 1.98 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 2.12 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 131,482 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Germany

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square, Denmark or Germany?
Germany, at 2.09 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 2.00 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Denmark as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square between Denmark and Germany?
84,790 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Germany ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Germany?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Denmark and Germany rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square?
Denmark ranks 18th and Germany ranks 17th of 159 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Denmark vs Germany: Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/denmark/germany/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/denmark/germany/">Denmark vs Germany: Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
192 places, 7,629 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.