Cuba vs Oman: Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square

Cuba
78,396 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Oman
77,497 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Cuba rank
81st
Oman rank
82nd

Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square over time

  • Cuba
  • Oman
20.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k100.0k197019962023

How they compare

Cuba currently reports 78,396 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 77,497 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Oman, a difference of 899 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1998 it was Cuba ahead.

Cuba ranks 81st and Oman ranks 82nd of 159 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 3 and Oman in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba Oman Difference Ahead
1990s 30,374 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 25,433 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 4,940 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Cuba
2000s 41,490 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 41,160 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 330.64 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Cuba
2010s 69,335 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 84,622 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 15,286 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Oman
2020s 79,404 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 78,917 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 487.07 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Cuba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square, Cuba or Oman?
Cuba, at 78,396 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 77,497 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Oman as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square between Cuba and Oman?
899 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Cuba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Oman?
26 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2023.
How do Cuba and Oman rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square?
Cuba ranks 81st and Oman ranks 82nd of 159 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs Oman: Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/cuba/oman/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/cuba/oman/">Cuba vs Oman: Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
192 places, 7,629 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.