Cuba vs Kiribati: Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square

Cuba
78,396 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Kiribati
88,392 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Cuba rank
81st
Kiribati rank
78th

Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square over time

  • Cuba
  • Kiribati
20.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k100.0k197019962023

How they compare

Kiribati currently reports 88,392 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 78,396 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Cuba, a difference of 9,996 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Kiribati's figure about 1.1 times Cuba's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Cuba ahead.

Cuba ranks 81st and Kiribati ranks 78th of 159 countries.

Cuba has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba Kiribati Difference Ahead
2000s 55,234 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 26,709 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 28,525 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Cuba
2010s 69,335 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 55,712 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 13,623 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Cuba
2020s 79,404 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 62,608 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 16,796 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Cuba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square, Cuba or Kiribati?
Kiribati, at 88,392 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 78,396 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Cuba as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square between Cuba and Kiribati?
9,996 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Kiribati ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Kiribati?
18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
How do Cuba and Kiribati rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square?
Cuba ranks 81st and Kiribati ranks 78th of 159 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs Kiribati: Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/cuba/kiribati/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/cuba/kiribati/">Cuba vs Kiribati: Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
192 places, 7,629 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.