Cuba vs Ecuador: Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square

Cuba
78,396 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador
78,403 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Cuba rank
81st
Ecuador rank
80th

Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square over time

  • Cuba
  • Ecuador
20.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k100.0k196119922023

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 78,403 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 78,396 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Cuba, a difference of 7 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Cuba ahead.

Cuba ranks 81st and Ecuador ranks 80th of 159 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 3 and Ecuador in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cuba Ecuador Difference Ahead
1970s 42,829 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 31,706 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 11,123 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Cuba
1980s 69,823 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 41,468 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 28,355 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Cuba
1990s 35,537 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 37,705 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 2,168 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Ecuador
2000s 41,490 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 43,512 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 2,022 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Ecuador
2010s 69,335 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 80,939 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 11,604 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Ecuador
2020s 79,404 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 72,868 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 6,536 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Cuba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square, Cuba or Ecuador?
Ecuador, at 78,403 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 78,396 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Cuba as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square between Cuba and Ecuador?
7 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Ecuador?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Cuba and Ecuador rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square?
Cuba ranks 81st and Ecuador ranks 80th of 159 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cuba vs Ecuador: Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/cuba/ecuador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/cuba/ecuador/">Cuba vs Ecuador: Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
192 places, 7,629 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.