Congo vs Zimbabwe: Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square

Congo
10,284 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
7,091 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Congo rank
142nd
Zimbabwe rank
145th

Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square over time

  • Congo
  • Zimbabwe
010.0k20.0k30.0k198520042023

How they compare

Congo currently reports 10,284 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 7,091 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 3,193 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Congo's figure about 1.5 times Zimbabwe's.

Across all 15 years both countries report, Congo has been ahead every year.

Congo ranks 142nd and Zimbabwe ranks 145th of 159 countries.

Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
2000s 11,332 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 2,618 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 8,714 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Congo
2010s 17,039 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 5,127 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 11,912 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Congo
2020s 8,980 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 5,717 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 3,263 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square, Congo or Zimbabwe?
Congo, at 10,284 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 7,091 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square between Congo and Zimbabwe?
3,193 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Zimbabwe?
15 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2023.
How do Congo and Zimbabwe rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square?
Congo ranks 142nd and Zimbabwe ranks 145th of 159 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Zimbabwe: Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/zimbabwe/">Congo vs Zimbabwe: Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
192 places, 7,629 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.