Congo vs Guinea-Bissau: Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square

Congo
10,284 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Guinea-Bissau
12,904 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Congo rank
142nd
Guinea-Bissau rank
139th

Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square over time

  • Congo
  • Guinea-Bissau
010.0k20.0k30.0k198520042023

How they compare

Guinea-Bissau currently reports 12,904 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 10,284 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Congo, a difference of 2,620 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Guinea-Bissau's figure about 1.3 times Congo's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 27 shared years of data; in 1997 it was Guinea-Bissau ahead.

Congo ranks 142nd and Guinea-Bissau ranks 139th of 159 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 2 and Guinea-Bissau in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Congo Guinea-Bissau Difference Ahead
1990s 3,889 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 4,039 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 150.61 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Guinea-Bissau
2000s 7,570 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 4,929 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 2,641 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Congo
2010s 17,039 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 7,594 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 9,445 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Congo
2020s 8,980 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 12,545 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 3,564 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Guinea-Bissau

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square, Congo or Guinea-Bissau?
Guinea-Bissau, at 12,904 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 10,284 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Congo as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square between Congo and Guinea-Bissau?
2,620 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Guinea-Bissau?
27 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2023.
How do Congo and Guinea-Bissau rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square?
Congo ranks 142nd and Guinea-Bissau ranks 139th of 159 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Congo vs Guinea-Bissau: Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/guinea-bissau/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/congo-rep/guinea-bissau/">Congo vs Guinea-Bissau: Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
192 places, 7,629 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.