Colombia vs Iceland: Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square

Colombia
54,736 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Iceland
55,846 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Colombia rank
97th
Iceland rank
96th

Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square over time

  • Colombia
  • Iceland
020.0k40.0k60.0k196519942023

How they compare

Iceland currently reports 55,846 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 54,736 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Colombia, a difference of 1,110 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 54 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Iceland ahead.

Colombia ranks 97th and Iceland ranks 96th of 159 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Colombia averaged higher in 3 and Iceland in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Colombia Iceland Difference Ahead
1970s 10,038 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 14,921 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 4,882 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Iceland
1980s 15,530 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 18,398 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 2,868 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Iceland
1990s 22,679 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 20,320 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 2,359 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Colombia
2000s 28,440 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 36,860 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 8,419 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Iceland
2010s 56,690 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 32,349 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 24,342 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Colombia
2020s 55,520 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 48,547 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 6,973 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Colombia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square, Colombia or Iceland?
Iceland, at 55,846 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 54,736 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Colombia as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square between Colombia and Iceland?
1,110 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Iceland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Colombia and Iceland?
54 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2023.
How do Colombia and Iceland rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square?
Colombia ranks 97th and Iceland ranks 96th of 159 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Colombia vs Iceland: Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/colombia/iceland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/colombia/iceland/">Colombia vs Iceland: Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
192 places, 7,629 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.