Chile vs Samoa: Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square

Chile
94,731 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Samoa
106,812 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Chile rank
77th
Samoa rank
74th

Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square over time

  • Chile
  • Samoa
025.0k50.0k75.0k100.0k125.0k196119922023

How they compare

Samoa currently reports 106,812 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 94,731 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Chile, a difference of 12,081 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Samoa's figure about 1.1 times Chile's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Samoa ahead.

Chile ranks 77th and Samoa ranks 74th of 159 countries.

Samoa has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Samoa Difference Ahead
2000s 59,596 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 84,338 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 24,742 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Samoa
2010s 81,135 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 103,145 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 22,010 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Samoa
2020s 89,328 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 103,986 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 14,658 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Samoa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square, Chile or Samoa?
Samoa, at 106,812 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 94,731 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Chile as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square between Chile and Samoa?
12,081 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Samoa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Samoa?
15 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2023.
How do Chile and Samoa rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square?
Chile ranks 77th and Samoa ranks 74th of 159 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Samoa: Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/chile/samoa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/chile/samoa/">Chile vs Samoa: Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
192 places, 7,629 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.