Chile vs Montenegro: Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square

Chile
94,731 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Montenegro
97,263 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Chile rank
77th
Montenegro rank
76th

Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square over time

  • Chile
  • Montenegro
025.0k50.0k75.0k100.0k125.0k196119922023

How they compare

Montenegro currently reports 97,263 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 94,731 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Chile, a difference of 2,532 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Chile ahead.

Chile ranks 77th and Montenegro ranks 76th of 159 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 1 and Montenegro in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Montenegro Difference Ahead
2000s 58,532 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 69,558 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 11,026 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Montenegro
2010s 81,135 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 74,488 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 6,647 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Chile
2020s 89,328 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 92,620 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 3,291 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Montenegro

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square, Chile or Montenegro?
Montenegro, at 97,263 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 94,731 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Chile as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square between Chile and Montenegro?
2,532 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Montenegro ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Montenegro?
18 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2023.
How do Chile and Montenegro rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square?
Chile ranks 77th and Montenegro ranks 76th of 159 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Montenegro: Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/chile/montenegro/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/chile/montenegro/">Chile vs Montenegro: Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
192 places, 7,629 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.