Botswana vs Zimbabwe: Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square

Botswana
7,479 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
7,091 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Botswana rank
144th
Zimbabwe rank
145th

Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square over time

  • Botswana
  • Zimbabwe
02.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k197519992023

How they compare

Botswana currently reports 7,479 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 7,091 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 388 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Botswana's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2009 it was Botswana ahead.

Botswana ranks 144th and Zimbabwe ranks 145th of 159 countries.

Botswana has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
2000s 4,370 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 2,618 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1,752 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Botswana
2010s 6,426 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 5,127 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1,299 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Botswana
2020s 7,258 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 5,717 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 1,541 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Botswana

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square, Botswana or Zimbabwe?
Botswana, at 7,479 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 7,091 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square between Botswana and Zimbabwe?
388 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Botswana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Zimbabwe?
15 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2023.
How do Botswana and Zimbabwe rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square?
Botswana ranks 144th and Zimbabwe ranks 145th of 159 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Zimbabwe: Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/botswana/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/botswana/zimbabwe/">Botswana vs Zimbabwe: Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
192 places, 7,629 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.