Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Chile: Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square

Bosnia and Herzegovina
101,857 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Chile
94,731 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Bosnia and Herzegovina rank
75th
Chile rank
77th

Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square over time

  • Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Chile
020.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k100.0k196119922023

How they compare

Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 101,857 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 94,731 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Chile, a difference of 7,126 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Bosnia and Herzegovina's figure about 1.1 times Chile's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 24 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.

Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 75th and Chile ranks 77th of 159 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Bosnia and Herzegovina averaged higher in 2 and Chile in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bosnia and Herzegovina Chile Difference Ahead
2000s 54,976 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 44,722 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 10,255 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Bosnia and Herzegovina
2010s 70,973 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 81,135 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 10,162 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Chile
2020s 91,931 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 89,328 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 2,603 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Bosnia and Herzegovina

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Chile?
Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 101,857 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 94,731 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Chile as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Chile?
7,126 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Chile?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Chile rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square?
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 75th and Chile ranks 77th of 159 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Chile: Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/bosnia-and-herzegovina/chile/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/bosnia-and-herzegovina/chile/">Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Chile: Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
192 places, 7,629 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.