Bermuda vs Singapore: Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square

Bermuda
15.63 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Singapore
129.80 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Bermuda rank
4th
Singapore rank
2nd

Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square over time

  • Bermuda
  • Singapore
050.0M100.0M150.0M196119922023

How they compare

Singapore currently reports 129.80 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 15.63 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Bermuda, a difference of 114.17 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

That makes Singapore's figure about 8.3 times Bermuda's.

Across all 10 years both countries report, Singapore has been ahead every year.

Bermuda ranks 4th and Singapore ranks 2nd of 159 countries.

Singapore has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bermuda Singapore Difference Ahead
2010s 17.01 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 119.31 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 102.30 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Singapore
2020s 15.78 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 123.09 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 107.31 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Singapore

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square, Bermuda or Singapore?
Singapore, at 129.80 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 15.63 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Bermuda as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square between Bermuda and Singapore?
114.17 million constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Singapore ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bermuda and Singapore?
10 years are reported by both, from 2014 to 2023.
How do Bermuda and Singapore rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square?
Bermuda ranks 4th and Singapore ranks 2nd of 159 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bermuda vs Singapore: Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/bermuda/singapore/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/bermuda/singapore/">Bermuda vs Singapore: Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
192 places, 7,629 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.