Belarus vs Nepal: Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square

Belarus
68,056 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Nepal
66,439 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Belarus rank
88th
Nepal rank
90th

Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square over time

  • Belarus
  • Nepal
20.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k100.0k199220072023

How they compare

Belarus currently reports 68,056 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 66,439 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Nepal, a difference of 1,617 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 23 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Nepal ahead.

Belarus ranks 88th and Nepal ranks 90th of 159 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 2 and Nepal in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Nepal Difference Ahead
2000s 44,781 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 24,812 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 19,969 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Belarus
2010s 85,513 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 47,855 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 37,658 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Belarus
2020s 67,752 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 72,803 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 5,051 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Nepal

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square, Belarus or Nepal?
Belarus, at 68,056 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 66,439 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Nepal as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square between Belarus and Nepal?
1,617 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Nepal?
23 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2023.
How do Belarus and Nepal rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square?
Belarus ranks 88th and Nepal ranks 90th of 159 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Nepal: Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/belarus/nepal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/belarus/nepal/">Belarus vs Nepal: Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
192 places, 7,629 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.