Belarus vs Gambia: Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square

Belarus
68,056 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Gambia
70,291 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Belarus rank
88th
Gambia rank
86th

Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square over time

  • Belarus
  • Gambia
20.0k40.0k60.0k80.0k100.0k199220072023

How they compare

Gambia currently reports 70,291 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 68,056 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Belarus, a difference of 2,235 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 20 shared years of data; in 2004 it was Belarus ahead.

Belarus ranks 88th and Gambia ranks 86th of 159 countries.

Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Gambia Difference Ahead
2000s 55,411 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 15,911 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 39,499 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Belarus
2010s 85,513 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 28,459 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 57,054 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Belarus
2020s 67,752 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 66,917 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre 835.05 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre Belarus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square, Belarus or Gambia?
Gambia, at 70,291 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre against 68,056 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre in Belarus as of 2023.
What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square between Belarus and Gambia?
2,235 constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre, with Gambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Gambia?
20 years are reported by both, from 2004 to 2023.
How do Belarus and Gambia rank globally for gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 us$), per square?
Belarus ranks 88th and Gambia ranks 86th of 159 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Gambia: Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/belarus/gambia-the/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://economy.statizoid.com/compare/gross-fixed-capital-formation-constant-2015-us-per-square-kilometre/belarus/gambia-the/">Belarus vs Gambia: Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$), per square kilometre
Unit
constant 2015 US$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
192 places, 7,629 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Gross fixed capital formation (constant 2015 US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.