Serbia vs Zimbabwe: Gross fixed capital formation
Gross fixed capital formation over time
- Serbia
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 1.2% against 0.8% in Serbia, a difference of 0.4%.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.4 times Serbia's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2010 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Serbia ranks 121st and Zimbabwe ranks 119th of 167 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Serbia averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Serbia | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 4.9% | 10.5% | 5.6% | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | 6.6% | 6.4% | 0.2% | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross fixed capital formation, Serbia or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 1.2% against 0.8% in Serbia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation between Serbia and Zimbabwe?
- 0.4%, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Serbia and Zimbabwe?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2024.
- How do Serbia and Zimbabwe rank globally for gross fixed capital formation?
- Serbia ranks 121st and Zimbabwe ranks 119th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Offices (NSOs), published as Gross fixed capital formation (annual % growth). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross fixed capital formation includes acquisitions less disposals of fixed assets during the accounting period, including certain specified expenditures on services that add to the value of non-produced assets. This indicator denotes the percentage change over each previous year of the constant price (base year 2015) series in United States dollars.