Philippines vs Serbia: Gross fixed capital formation
Gross fixed capital formation over time
- Philippines
- Serbia
How they compare
Serbia currently reports 0.8% against 0.8% in Philippines, a difference of 0.0%.
That makes Serbia's figure about 1.1 times Philippines's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2001 it was Serbia ahead.
Philippines ranks 121st and Serbia ranks 120th of 166 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Philippines averaged higher in 1 and Serbia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Philippines | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 4.3% | 12.0% | 7.7% | Serbia |
| 2010s | 11.0% | 4.9% | 6.2% | Philippines |
| 2020s | 1.3% | 5.6% | 4.4% | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross fixed capital formation, Philippines or Serbia?
- Serbia, at 0.8% against 0.8% in Philippines as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation between Philippines and Serbia?
- 0.0%, with Serbia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Philippines and Serbia?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2001 to 2025.
- How do Philippines and Serbia rank globally for gross fixed capital formation?
- Philippines ranks 121st and Serbia ranks 120th of 166 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Offices (NSOs), published as Gross fixed capital formation (annual % growth). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross fixed capital formation includes acquisitions less disposals of fixed assets during the accounting period, including certain specified expenditures on services that add to the value of non-produced assets. This indicator denotes the percentage change over each previous year of the constant price (base year 2015) series in United States dollars.