Norway vs Serbia: Gross fixed capital formation
Gross fixed capital formation over time
- Norway
- Serbia
How they compare
Norway currently reports 1.3% against 0.8% in Serbia, a difference of 0.5%.
That makes Norway's figure about 1.5 times Serbia's.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Serbia ahead.
Norway ranks 118th and Serbia ranks 121st of 167 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Norway averaged higher in 1 and Serbia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Norway | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 7.8% | 5.0% | 2.8% | Norway |
| 2000s | 3.8% | 11.4% | 7.6% | Serbia |
| 2010s | 3.2% | 4.9% | 1.7% | Serbia |
| 2020s | -0.5% | 5.6% | 6.1% | Serbia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross fixed capital formation, Norway or Serbia?
- Norway, at 1.3% against 0.8% in Serbia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation between Norway and Serbia?
- 0.5%, with Norway ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Norway and Serbia?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
- How do Norway and Serbia rank globally for gross fixed capital formation?
- Norway ranks 118th and Serbia ranks 121st of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Offices (NSOs), published as Gross fixed capital formation (annual % growth). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross fixed capital formation includes acquisitions less disposals of fixed assets during the accounting period, including certain specified expenditures on services that add to the value of non-produced assets. This indicator denotes the percentage change over each previous year of the constant price (base year 2015) series in United States dollars.