North Macedonia vs Sudan: Gross fixed capital formation
Gross fixed capital formation over time
- North Macedonia
- Sudan
How they compare
North Macedonia currently reports 5.0% against 4.5% in Sudan, a difference of 0.5%.
That makes North Macedonia's figure about 1.1 times Sudan's.
Across all 6 years both countries report, North Macedonia has been ahead every year.
North Macedonia ranks 82nd and Sudan ranks 85th of 167 countries.
North Macedonia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | North Macedonia | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 8.7% | -0.2% | 8.9% | North Macedonia |
| 2020s | 3.7% | -7.6% | 11.3% | North Macedonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross fixed capital formation, North Macedonia or Sudan?
- North Macedonia, at 5.0% against 4.5% in Sudan as of 2024.
- What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation between North Macedonia and Sudan?
- 0.5%, with North Macedonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for North Macedonia and Sudan?
- 6 years are reported by both, from 2019 to 2024.
- How do North Macedonia and Sudan rank globally for gross fixed capital formation?
- North Macedonia ranks 82nd and Sudan ranks 85th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Offices (NSOs), published as Gross fixed capital formation (annual % growth). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross fixed capital formation includes acquisitions less disposals of fixed assets during the accounting period, including certain specified expenditures on services that add to the value of non-produced assets. This indicator denotes the percentage change over each previous year of the constant price (base year 2015) series in United States dollars.