Macao vs Namibia: Gross fixed capital formation
Macao
-7.8%
in 2025
Namibia
-8.3%
in 2025
Macao rank
157th
Namibia rank
158th
Gross fixed capital formation over time
- Macao
- Namibia
How they compare
Macao currently reports -7.8% against -8.3% in Namibia, a difference of 0.5%.
The two have swapped places 16 times across 43 shared years of data; in 1983 it was Macao ahead.
Macao ranks 157th and Namibia ranks 158th of 166 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Macao averaged higher in 3 and Namibia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Macao | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 9.4% | -2.5% | 11.9% | Macao |
| 1990s | 4.3% | 9.8% | 5.5% | Namibia |
| 2000s | 14.2% | 10.5% | 3.8% | Macao |
| 2010s | 3.0% | -0.0% | 3.0% | Macao |
| 2020s | -3.6% | 11.1% | 14.7% | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross fixed capital formation, Macao or Namibia?
- Macao, at -7.8% against -8.3% in Namibia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation between Macao and Namibia?
- 0.5%, with Macao ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Macao and Namibia?
- 43 years are reported by both, from 1983 to 2025.
- How do Macao and Namibia rank globally for gross fixed capital formation?
- Macao ranks 157th and Namibia ranks 158th of 166 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Offices (NSOs), published as Gross fixed capital formation (annual % growth). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross fixed capital formation includes acquisitions less disposals of fixed assets during the accounting period, including certain specified expenditures on services that add to the value of non-produced assets. This indicator denotes the percentage change over each previous year of the constant price (base year 2015) series in United States dollars.