Low income vs Palau: Gross fixed capital formation
Gross fixed capital formation over time
- Low income
- Palau
How they compare
Palau currently reports 12.6% against 0.9% in Low income, a difference of 11.7%.
That makes Palau's figure about 14.3 times Low income's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Low income ahead.
Low income ranks 30th and Palau ranks 26th of 33 groups.
Low income has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Low income | Palau | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 6.7% | 6.2% | 0.5% | Low income |
| 2020s | 6.7% | -0.2% | 6.9% | Low income |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross fixed capital formation, Low income or Palau?
- Palau, at 12.6% against 0.9% in Low income as of 2024.
- What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation between Low income and Palau?
- 11.7%, with Palau ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Low income and Palau?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2024.
- How do Low income and Palau rank globally for gross fixed capital formation?
- Low income ranks 30th and Palau ranks 26th of 33 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Offices (NSOs), published as Gross fixed capital formation (annual % growth). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross fixed capital formation includes acquisitions less disposals of fixed assets during the accounting period, including certain specified expenditures on services that add to the value of non-produced assets. This indicator denotes the percentage change over each previous year of the constant price (base year 2015) series in United States dollars.