Low income vs Madagascar: Gross fixed capital formation
Gross fixed capital formation over time
- Low income
- Madagascar
How they compare
Madagascar currently reports 12.3% against 0.9% in Low income, a difference of 11.4%.
That makes Madagascar's figure about 13.9 times Low income's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Low income ahead.
Low income ranks 28th and Madagascar ranks 27th of 31 groups.
Low income has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Low income | Madagascar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 6.7% | 3.5% | 3.1% | Low income |
| 2020s | 5.7% | 3.7% | 2.0% | Low income |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross fixed capital formation, Low income or Madagascar?
- Madagascar, at 12.3% against 0.9% in Low income as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation between Low income and Madagascar?
- 11.4%, with Madagascar ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Low income and Madagascar?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2025.
- How do Low income and Madagascar rank globally for gross fixed capital formation?
- Low income ranks 28th and Madagascar ranks 27th of 31 groups.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Offices (NSOs), published as Gross fixed capital formation (annual % growth). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross fixed capital formation includes acquisitions less disposals of fixed assets during the accounting period, including certain specified expenditures on services that add to the value of non-produced assets. This indicator denotes the percentage change over each previous year of the constant price (base year 2015) series in United States dollars.