Lithuania vs Uganda: Gross fixed capital formation
Gross fixed capital formation over time
- Lithuania
- Uganda
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 8.0% against 7.2% in Uganda, a difference of 0.8%.
That makes Lithuania's figure about 1.1 times Uganda's.
The two have swapped places 16 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1996 it was Lithuania ahead.
Lithuania ranks 55th and Uganda ranks 58th of 166 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Lithuania averaged higher in 3 and Uganda in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | Uganda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 15.5% | 6.5% | 9.0% | Lithuania |
| 2000s | 5.7% | 8.4% | 2.7% | Uganda |
| 2010s | 6.7% | 6.7% | 0.1% | Lithuania |
| 2020s | 6.1% | 4.9% | 1.2% | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross fixed capital formation, Lithuania or Uganda?
- Lithuania, at 8.0% against 7.2% in Uganda as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation between Lithuania and Uganda?
- 0.8%, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Uganda?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1996 to 2025.
- How do Lithuania and Uganda rank globally for gross fixed capital formation?
- Lithuania ranks 55th and Uganda ranks 58th of 166 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Offices (NSOs), published as Gross fixed capital formation (annual % growth). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross fixed capital formation includes acquisitions less disposals of fixed assets during the accounting period, including certain specified expenditures on services that add to the value of non-produced assets. This indicator denotes the percentage change over each previous year of the constant price (base year 2015) series in United States dollars.