Kyrgyzstan vs Nicaragua: Gross fixed capital formation
Kyrgyzstan
21.1%
in 2025
Nicaragua
21.3%
in 2025
Kyrgyzstan rank
10th
Nicaragua rank
9th
Gross fixed capital formation over time
- Kyrgyzstan
- Nicaragua
How they compare
Nicaragua currently reports 21.3% against 21.1% in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 0.2%.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 15 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Nicaragua ahead.
Kyrgyzstan ranks 10th and Nicaragua ranks 9th of 167 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Kyrgyzstan averaged higher in 1 and Nicaragua in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kyrgyzstan | Nicaragua | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 9.5% | 2.5% | 7.0% | Kyrgyzstan |
| 2020s | 11.2% | 15.3% | 4.2% | Nicaragua |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross fixed capital formation, Kyrgyzstan or Nicaragua?
- Nicaragua, at 21.3% against 21.1% in Kyrgyzstan as of 2025.
- What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation between Kyrgyzstan and Nicaragua?
- 0.2%, with Nicaragua ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Nicaragua?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2025.
- How do Kyrgyzstan and Nicaragua rank globally for gross fixed capital formation?
- Kyrgyzstan ranks 10th and Nicaragua ranks 9th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Offices (NSOs), published as Gross fixed capital formation (annual % growth). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross fixed capital formation includes acquisitions less disposals of fixed assets during the accounting period, including certain specified expenditures on services that add to the value of non-produced assets. This indicator denotes the percentage change over each previous year of the constant price (base year 2015) series in United States dollars.