Kiribati vs Timor-Leste: Gross fixed capital formation
Gross fixed capital formation over time
- Kiribati
- Timor-Leste
How they compare
Timor-Leste currently reports 41.7% against 27.1% in Kiribati, a difference of 14.6%.
That makes Timor-Leste's figure about 1.5 times Kiribati's.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Timor-Leste ahead.
Kiribati ranks 5th and Timor-Leste ranks 4th of 167 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Kiribati averaged higher in 2 and Timor-Leste in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | Timor-Leste | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.5% | 79.8% | 77.3% | Timor-Leste |
| 2010s | 7.9% | 2.6% | 5.2% | Kiribati |
| 2020s | 21.5% | 8.3% | 13.2% | Kiribati |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross fixed capital formation, Kiribati or Timor-Leste?
- Timor-Leste, at 41.7% against 27.1% in Kiribati as of 2024.
- What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation between Kiribati and Timor-Leste?
- 14.6%, with Timor-Leste ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and Timor-Leste?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2024.
- How do Kiribati and Timor-Leste rank globally for gross fixed capital formation?
- Kiribati ranks 5th and Timor-Leste ranks 4th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Offices (NSOs), published as Gross fixed capital formation (annual % growth). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross fixed capital formation includes acquisitions less disposals of fixed assets during the accounting period, including certain specified expenditures on services that add to the value of non-produced assets. This indicator denotes the percentage change over each previous year of the constant price (base year 2015) series in United States dollars.