Kiribati vs South Asia: Gross fixed capital formation
Gross fixed capital formation over time
- Kiribati
- South Asia
How they compare
Kiribati currently reports 27.1% against 6.3% in South Asia, a difference of 20.8%.
That makes Kiribati's figure about 4.3 times South Asia's.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 18 shared years of data; in 2007 it was South Asia ahead.
Kiribati ranks 5th and South Asia ranks 3rd of 167 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Kiribati averaged higher in 2 and South Asia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Kiribati | South Asia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 2.5% | 8.9% | 6.5% | South Asia |
| 2010s | 7.9% | 6.9% | 1.0% | Kiribati |
| 2020s | 21.5% | 6.1% | 15.5% | Kiribati |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher gross fixed capital formation, Kiribati or South Asia?
- Kiribati, at 27.1% against 6.3% in South Asia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in gross fixed capital formation between Kiribati and South Asia?
- 20.8%, with Kiribati ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Kiribati and South Asia?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2024.
- How do Kiribati and South Asia rank globally for gross fixed capital formation?
- Kiribati ranks 5th and South Asia ranks 3rd of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Country official statistics, National Statistical Offices (NSOs), published as Gross fixed capital formation (annual % growth). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Gross fixed capital formation includes acquisitions less disposals of fixed assets during the accounting period, including certain specified expenditures on services that add to the value of non-produced assets. This indicator denotes the percentage change over each previous year of the constant price (base year 2015) series in United States dollars.